[ad_1]
The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) has imposed a R10.6 million administrative penalty on Sanlam Collective Investments (SCI) for failing to comply with key provisions of the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) Act, including deficiencies in its risk management and compliance systems.
SA’s financial sector watchdog announced the fine on Monday, which is essentially linked to non-compliance of anti-money laundering rules.
Listen/read:
Are the FIC’s teeth sharp enough to combat corruption?
FSCA issued R120m in penalties and withdrew 382 licences in a year
The FSCA said the sanction follows a March 2024 inspection that found SCI’s Risk Management and Compliance Programme (RMCP) was not effectively implemented, particularly in the risk rating of clients.
The programme also failed to adequately address several legal requirements, such as enhanced due diligence on partnerships, the examination of unusually large transactions, and the reporting of suspicious or reportable activities.
Inspectors further found that SCI had not properly identified or verified some clients and beneficial owners, and had not carried out the necessary ongoing or enhanced due diligence on high-risk or politically exposed clients.
In determining the penalty, the FSCA took into account SCI’s previous non-compliance with financial sector laws, including a past enforceable undertaking and a contravention of the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act (Cisca) that resulted in a financial penalty.
ADVERTISEMENT
CONTINUE READING BELOW
Recognising remedial measures already taken, the FSCA agreed to suspend R3.6 million of the fine for two years, provided SCI fully rectifies the breaches and maintains compliance during that period.
Heightened level of vigilance
The regulator described the violations as “serious”, citing the size and market influence of SCI, and stressed that effective anti-money-laundering controls are critical to protecting the financial system’s integrity.
“Proper due diligence of all clients is crucial to help identify and mitigate against suspicious and criminal elements from infiltrating the financial system. Financial institutions operating within large, international financial services groups are expected to demonstrate a heightened level of vigilance in this regard,” the regulator notes.
The FSCA emphasises that all accountable institutions must strengthen their anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorism financing frameworks, warning that further failures “will result in firm regulatory action”.
Exiting the grey list
ADVERTISEMENT:
CONTINUE READING BELOW
South Africa’s regulatory bodies, such as the FSCA and the South African Reserve Bank’s Prudential Authority (PA) have in the past few years stepped up enforcement action against institutions that fail to meet anti-money laundering obligations.
The PA has imposed a series of administrative sanctions on several financial institutions – including Standard Bank, Capitec Bank, Old Mutual, Bidvest Bank and HSBC – for shortcomings in their compliance with the FIC Act.
The heightened enforcement action follows South Africa’s greylisting by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in February 2023, after deficiencies were identified in anti-money laundering, counter-terrorist financing and counter-proliferation controls.
South Africa is however expected to exit the grey list soon.
The National Treasury noted earlier that it was confident that the country would comply with all the applicable recommendations by the time of the October mutual evaluation assessment.
Read:
FSCA plans tighter rules for its sprawling repo market
SA and Nigeria set to exit dirty-money list next month
The FIC is making life difficult for criminals
Follow Moneyweb’s in-depth finance and business news on WhatsApp here.
[ad_2]
Source link